Here's How Pfizer Can Claim Jab has No Serious Safety Concerns
'The vaccine was 100% effective against severe disease, with no serious Safety Concerns.'
According to Pfizer, the biggest makers of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, the product confirmed high efficacy with no serious safety concerns through up to six months following second dose. That was the 'topline analysis of landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Study.' They go on to claim 'The vaccine was 100% effective against severe disease as defined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and 95.3% effective against severe COVID-19 as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).'
This is confirmed by the mainstream media, Facebook 'fact-checkers',and barstool 'experts' on social media everywhere. We are told by everyone there is no issue with Covid vaccines. They are not only 100% safe but 100% effective too. Doctors and scientists all around the world unanimously agree, the vaccines have been incredibly successful with not a single adverse event reported anywhere, for any reason, by anyone.
A simple search on Google confirms there is no problem with mRNA vaccines, just result after result from fact-checkers stating that anyone reporting there are is a conspiracy theorist, spreading 'dangerous misinformation' and causing 'real-world harm'.
There are experts checking the safety of these things.
If there was a problem then those whose job it is to protect us would check these things. The CDC and MHRA must have independently run trails on the products, not simply taken the manufacturer's word for it. That would be a huge betrayal of public trust for one thing, and a dereliction of duty for another. (Both of those are facts: the FDA and MHRA didn't run a single independent trial on any of these mRNA vaccines, they simply 'reviewed' the data that Pfizer gave them.)
If there was a problem the media would tell us.
That, of course, is utter nonsense. Most of the Mainstream media receive funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, including the BBC ($3,668,657), CNN ($3,600,000) Guardian ($12,951,391) and Telegraph ($3,446,801) with virtually every press association and media organisation also receiving huge amounts to keep repeat 'the message'. Approximately $300million per annum is given by the Gates Foundation to various press and broadcast outlets and that buys you a lot of friends. Whilst dozens of other journalists have been found to have individually taken Gates coin without informing their readers, such as the two New York Times Journalists who had been writing glowing reports about the Gates foundation for years without mentioning that they also worked for one of its subsidiaries.
Facebook have checked the facts so we don't have to.
Facebook's supposed 'independent fact-checkers' called upon for all that important 'impartial advice' on Vaccines are secretly funded by the very pharmaceuticals companies making them. The 'independent fact-checkers really just protecting the profits of big pharma.
Why is there nothing about it on Google then?
Google too have received substantial amounts of money from pharmaceutical companies since the pandemic began. Google's parent business 'Alphabet' jointly own a drugs-research company (Verily) together with Novartis, Sanofi, Otsuka and Pfizer presenting a massive conflict of interest. As 95% of the world's internet searches are done on Google they have become seen as a neutral tool that simply lists the information you ask for. This is furthest from the truth. Google show you what they want you to see, and they do not want you to see anything about vaccine injuries or vaccine deaths, because their business partners wouldn't like it, so the information is simply never shown, giving the illusion that there is no issue.
But there is an issue, and despite all of the efforts by big tech and big pharma to vanish the evidence, the true is becoming known, and a reckoning will surely follow.