The BBC have stopped reporting on blood clot deaths related to Covid-19 Vaccines so the public think that the problem has gone away. It hasn't, deaths are still occuring at an alarming rate - the equivalent of 3 Jumbo Jets full of people dead in just six months. Meanwhile the Government and it's propaganda arm, the BBC, claim that the Indian Variant is the biggest risk to life for the UK public, yet there have been just 4 deaths recorded as being caused by it.
Vaccine Deaths vs Indian Variant Death
The UK Government have reluctantly been forced to publish the results from its Yellow Card system that is set up to document any adverse effects related to Covid-19 Vaccines. Although there have been questions over the accuracy of the process, with experts claiming that tens of thousands of events are going unrecorded, the figures still make for some alarming reading.
As you might expect, there is a great deal of obfuscation, disclaimers and caveats with these data, the official narrative is that there is no evidence that a death occurring after a vaccination is caused by the vaccination. But these are the same experts who count every death after a positive test as a Covid death. Were we to apply the exact same 'logic' to these figures, then the figures would be 175,000 deaths caused by Covid Vaccines. Applying their logic (bullshit) shows just how blatant their manipulation of the figures has been.
Deaths that follow a Vaccine are much more likely to be Vaccine related for a number of important reasons, firstly these incidents happen much closer to the application of a vaccine, some report that the person even dying in the 15 minutes observation time that is specifically performed for adverse reactions. Secondly the deaths all appear to be related to blood-clots and low platelets, and thirdly the yellow card system is only for clinical reporting, that is to say, that clinicians fill in the yellow cards, not members of the public, meaning the diagnosis is going to more accurate.
The Yellow Card system states the following:
A report of a suspected ADR to the Yellow Card scheme does not necessarily mean that it was caused by the vaccine, only that the reporter has a suspicion it may have. Underlying or previously undiagnosed illness unrelated to vaccination can also be factors in such reports. The relative number and nature of reports should therefore not be used to compare the safety of the different vaccines. All reports are kept under continual review in order to identify possible new risks.
(It's a pity they didn't use that approach when counting Covid deaths)
it then goes on to say:
Up to and including 12 May 2021, the MHRA received and analysed 58,065 UK Yellow Cards from people who have received the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. These reports include a total of 165,219 suspected reactions (i.e. a single report may contain more than one symptom). The first report was received on 9 December 2020.
Up to and including 12 May 2021, the MHRA received and analysed a total of 175,057 UK reports of suspected ADRs to the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca. These reports include a total of 650,681 suspected reactions (a single report may contain more than one symptom). The first report was received on 4 January 2021.
Up to and including 12 May 2021, the MHRA received and analysed a total of 1.462 UK reports of suspected ADRs to the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna. These include a total of 4,168 suspected reactions (a single report may contain more than one symptom). The first report was received on 7 April 2021.
Additionally, up to and including 12 May 2021, the MHRA received 639 Yellow Card reports where the brand of vaccine was not specified by the reporter.
In the week since the previous summary for 5 May we have received a further 2,349 Yellow Cards for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, 7,916 for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, 381 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and 33 where the brand was not specified.
Whilst in the section described as 'Events with a fatal outcome' it details the deaths caused by each vaccine make:
The MHRA has received 374 UK reports of suspected ADRs to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in which the patient died shortly after vaccination, 786 reports for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, 2 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and 16 where the brand of vaccine was unspecified. The majority of these reports were in elderly people or people with underlying illness. Usage of the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca has increased rapidly and as such, so has reporting of fatal events with a temporal association with vaccination however, this does not indicate a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccine played a role in the death.
This Pandemic has been driven entirely by the presentation of data by SAGE, the Government and the BBC. Imagine, for a moment, that the same treatment for the Indian Variant was given to vaccine deaths. The death figures in massive font, as we have done here, updated daily and shown on every news bulletin. Ministers being questioned about Vaccine Deaths at press briefings. The BBC running a dozen news stories a day on Vaccine Deaths, with at least half of them interviewing the family of the victim who received the jab and promptly died. The family saying "he was only young, they told him it was safe!" whilst holding up a photo of the now deceased as the family weep before demanding an enquiry. This is routinely done for Covid deaths and repeated for the Indian Variant, despite it not being a risk at all. Note the difference in attitude in these two things.
The government are actively trying to deny these deaths, despite clear clinical links between the vaccine and the fatality. Their denial will mean it is highly unlikely that the families of those who died will get compensation and there certainly won't be an enquiry into their deaths either. Deaths from vaccines are considered 'collateral damage' by SAGE even though they are actively breaking the Nuremberg Code in doing so. Choose wisely.
