top of page

UK Government About to Break the Nuremberg Code and Make Vaccines Mandatory by De Facto

The UK government are planning to force ALL people to take the vaccine in direct breach of the Nuremberg Code.

Not only are the UK government planning on denying people international travel if they don't have it, but also entry into pubs, restaurants, sports events, and any public buildings. To try and get around the freedom of choice issue, the Government's plan is to make the service and leisure industries be the fall-guys.

As we reported last year, vaccine ‘passports’ will be required for ALL international travel from 2021. In addition the UK government are planning for the hospitality and leisure industries to police this law by demanding people produce vaccine certificates before they are allowed to enter pubs and restaurants. Fines of up to £50,000 for every breach of these rules could be levied to force companies to comply. Pubs will not only have to ask for ID at the door, but will also demand an up-to-date Covid Vaccine certificate in future.

UK vaccine minister Nadhim Zahawi said he expects bars, cinemas, restaurants and sports stadiums to all demand proof of vaccination against COVID-19 before allowing customers to enter their venues. boasting "It Will Become Virtually Impossible To Do Anything If You Don’t Have The Vaccine" effectively forcing the public to have the vaccination by de facto.

The vaccines, although administered already to over 15 million people in the UK, are still in their trial stage, none of them finishing trials until 2023. The US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials database at the Pfizer BioNTech SE Clinical Study Trial for instance states, somewhat alarmingly, that their trails have an Estimated Study Completion Date is January 31, 2023.

no patient was informed of this fact, that effectively they are part of a huge experiment, which is in DIRECT CONTRADICTION to the Nuremberg Code.

The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of research ethic principles for human experimentation created as a result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War. In one of the trials, which became known as the "Doctors' Trial", German physicians responsible for conducting unethical medical procedures on humans during the war were tried. They focused on physicians who conducted inhumane and unethical human experiments in concentration camps, in addition to those who were involved in over 3,500,000 sterilisations of German citizens.

The ten points of the code were given in the section of the verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments"

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

  9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

  10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

2,771 views0 comments
bottom of page