SURVEILLANCE SHOCKER: Council Plans Drones in the Sky, AI Cameras on every Street, and Loud Speakers Giving Orders

With a fleet of drones overhead and 2,500 AI cameras that can follow you for weeks, this London borough is pioneering Britain’s most China-like surveillance borough.

Hammersmith & Fulham is about to become the frontline of Britain’s surveillance state. In plans that sound more like a sci-fi dictatorship than a west London borough, the council is preparing to roll out drones, facial recognition, and AI-powered cameras in a £3 million taxpayer-funded scheme.

Forget CCTV as you know it. This is Orwell's Big Brother made real.

• Fixed cameras with live facial recognition to scan you in real time.

• Drones circling overhead, tracking movements from above.

• Retrospective face-matching to pull up your past whereabouts.

• 500 AI-driven cameras monitoring vehicles, tagging GPS locations, and flagging “crowd build-ups.”

• And, in a move straight from Orwell, speakers mounted on lampposts, letting officers bark orders at passers-by.

It’s being sold as “safety.” Critics call it “state snooping on steroids.”

Already the Most Watched Borough

The proposals are striking because Hammersmith & Fulham is already the most monitored borough in Britain. With 2,000 cameras already installed, it has more surveillance devices per resident than anywhere else in the UK.

Yet the figures tell a different story about effectiveness. Despite its camera coverage, the borough consistently appears in the top ten most dangerous areas in London. According to the Metropolitan Police’s most recent data, H&F has higher-than-average rates of violent crime, burglary, and robbery compared with outer boroughs that rely on far fewer cameras.

That raises an uncomfortable question: if 2,000 cameras haven’t delivered safety, why should 2,500 — bolstered by AI and drones — suddenly succeed?

What the Technology Really Does

Unlike traditional CCTV, which passively records, live facial recognition actively scans faces against police watchlists. Every pedestrian is effectively stopped, checked, and cleared in milliseconds. The addition of retrospective recognition means the council could rewind the borough’s footage to trace an individual’s movements across days or weeks.

The scale is vast. With 500 AI cameras feeding into a central system, operators could run instant searches through thousands of hours of footage, reconstructing journeys, meetings, and behaviours. Vehicle-tracking functions allow GPS-tagged movement logs, while “crowd alerts” flag gatherings for potential intervention.

Civil liberties groups warn of the risks:

• Studies by the University of Essex found live facial recognition produced false matches in up to 81% of cases.

• Independent trials showed the technology was less accurate with women and ethnic minorities, raising fears of disproportionate targeting.

• The Information Commissioner’s Office has repeatedly cautioned against its routine deployment in public spaces.

Security or Control?

The council insists this is about “keeping residents safe.” But critics argue it’s a high-cost illusion of security — £3 million spent on gadgets while underlying crime problems remain unaddressed.

The danger, they warn, is not just technical flaws but cultural creep. Once a borough normalises drones in the sky and speakers on the street, the line between policing and surveillance society begins to blur.

For now, the cameras are coming. The drones are coming. The loudspeakers are coming. Hammersmith & Fulham is on track to become Britain’s first fully-fledged Orwellian borough.

Related:

Britain to become the Ultimate Surveillance State