top of page

Part Two: How They Pulled Off the Biggest Medical Fraud in History



PART TWO

by Darren Birks and Philip James


In part one of our exposé into the Covid fraud we revealed how the World Health Organisation chose an unremarkable pneumonia virus as the basis for their fraud; how the Chinese CDC claimed they’d mapped the entire genome in just 3 days, and that a fake doctor had developed a diagnostic test in just 19 more, all without an actual virus being present for any of it.


To read Part ONE of the expose click HERE


In part two we’ll reveal exactly how authorities made it appear as if the pandemic was real by the use of a test that didn't work, the 'reimagining' of what constituted a 'case', co-oping every other type of death as a Covid death and falsifying thousands of death certificates to claim Covid was a mass killer.

One of the most shocking things about the scamdemic was the sheer ease with which it was perpetrated on an unsuspecting public. It really only required the W.H.O. to change a few basic rules for the scam to work.

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie" - Joseph Goebbels

7.The entire scam hinged on a lab test that didn't work (just like its original inventor said it wouldn't.)

A (fake) Doctor claimed he'd created a reliable test that could detect the Covid virus without ever actually seeing a Covid Virus at any point in the process, and he did so in just 19 days from scratch, using a technique (RT_PCR) that the original inventor had specifically said couldn't tell you if you were ill.


The entire Covid Fraud hinged on the PCR test. Without a test that 'diagnosed' a case it simply would not have been possible to perpetrate a fraud at all, let alone one on such a massive scale. Everything that followed was due to that test, and the spurious claim it was detecting a killer disease.


Kary Mullis the Nobel prize-winning scientist who invented the original RT_PCR test had repeatedly stated that his invention could not detect if a person was sick, and should not be used as a diagnostic tool . Mullis is on record as saying:


"If you can amplify one single molecule, up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there are very few molecules that you don't have one single one of them, ok? So that could be thought of as a misuse of it."


"PCR is just a test that makes a whole lot of something out of something, it doesn't tell you if you are sick, and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with, really was going to hurt you.."

But that didn't stop Christian Drosten claiming that he'd created a reliable test that could detect the SARS-Cov2 Virus. Or that he'd not seen a Covid virus at any time whilst making it. The paper he published making the wild claims clearly stated: "designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens.”


8.Lab Results Were Manipulated to Give Positive Results.

Amplification of the PCR test from 10 cycles to 40 meant 'positive' results were almost guaranteed

"There are very few molecules that you don't have one single one of.." PCR inventor Kary Mullis.

To find more 'cases' testing centres were ordered to increase the amplification cycles of the RT_PCR tests from 21 to 36 and then to 40, some 30 times greater than the pre-covid cycle limit. This was claimed to make the tests "more accurate" but what it really did was diagnose more healthy people with the phantom virus. Scientists were casting their net so wide that you were unlikely NOT to have at least one molecule that resembled a fragment of Covid DNA, itself a computer model of what the virus might look like.


9."Test, test, test"

The World Health Organisation encouraged officials to perform speculative testing on the public, something that had never been done before for any type of coronavirus.

On the 12th January 2020 World Health Organisation Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus instructed health officials to ramp up the speculative testing saying: "test, test, test' knowing that doing so would 'find' tens of millions more cases.


Health Officials then took to the speculative testing with gusto, armed with a test that would almost certainly give a positive result, the double deception making it look like the virus was spreading 'exponentially' when it wasn't.


10. Healthy people were reclassified as 'Asymptomatic'.

When the con was questioned the WHO employed even more pseudoscience, concocting another new medical theory; you weren't healthy any more, you were "Asymptomatic". Few people questioned the theory because, after all, health authorities had the proof to back up the claim in the form of a PCR test. They would later use a similar trick to claim that the vaccine was working as well.


On the 27th May 2020 the World Health Organisation updated clinical guidance on the 12th Jan original. Said to be 'more detailed', it increased the emphasis on asymptomatic cases stating: 'an asymptomatic case is an individual who has a laboratory confirmed positive test (PCR) and who has no symptoms during the complete course of infection.'


Now, millions of people who didn't have Pneumonia were being counted as if they did, and included in the statistics. Hurriedly rushed out studies including Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 reported the phantom illnesses as real, estimating that 40-45% of total 'cases' were 'Asymptomatic Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)'


Some medical practitioners, who didn't have a vested interest in the scamdemic, pointed out that you cannot have an "Asymptomatic case" of a "severe respiratory disease" and that this was a contradiction in terms.


With this new sleight of hand, millions of people who didn't have the illness, could now be counted as if they did. Just to add to the confusion the Government told people to "act like you have it" when they obviously didn't.


One lie was being built upon another, and another; and with each step the world was moving further away from reality.


None of this mattered of course, nobody was allowed to question the 'argument from authority'. Anyone who tried including world renowned experts, were labelled conspiracy theorists and were 'cancelled' for their heresy. Of course there was a killer plague on the loose, the WHO had ‘proof’ that the pandemic was real in the form of millions of infections. These phantom infections were then graphed-up and given to the media who dutifully reported them as fact.


A fake ‘testing’ pandemic would not, however, sustain the fraud forever. When people saw that nobody was actually dying, support for restrictions or demand for a vaccine would be lost. The WHO would need dead bodies, and lots of them, to sustain the lie, prompting the next stage of the fraud.


11. Death Counts Were Falsified

"A death from any cause, following a positive Covid-19 test"

The con was hiding in plain sight. 'Deaths From Any Cause' were counted as covid deaths regardless of what really killed them.


On the 12th of January 2020, the same day that Tedros Ghebreyesus told health authorities to "test, test, test" the World Health Organisation announced the technical process for recording Covid deaths. A 'Covid Death' it said, would be "a death from any cause, following a positive Covid-19 test"


This brazen lie proved decisive in cementing the idea that a killer plague was on the loose in the minds of the public: Simply recording other deaths as if they were Covid, it has to be said, was a master-stroke. The deceased only had to have a positive test at any time prior to their death to be counted as a Covid death in the DofH statistics, even though the two medical events were entirely unrelated.

In 2020 there were claimed to be 73,766 deaths due to COVID-19 in the UK, with that total now well over 200,000. This figure was the easiest to manufacture, and the most difficult to dispel. Attempt to argue that Covid was a fraud and believers will angrily point to these deaths as concrete evidence that it was real, and that you need a tinfoil hat. Even though you are not arguing that those deaths occurred, just what killed them, what they hear is you are denying they died at all. Of course those people died, that is not in question, but what caused their deaths, very much is.


There is a compelling argument to suggest that there were no Covid deaths at all, because the virus was never isolated, the PCR test didn't work, and physical symptoms were identical to seasonal flu, therefore there was no proof Covid actually existed, let alone caused a death.


A Covid Death was officially being counted as "a death from any cause, following a positive Covid-19 test" yet the two 'medical' events were entirely unrelated.


12. Public Health's method of counting meant everyone would eventually 'die of Covid'.

The truth was revealed in a paper by Yoon K Loke and Carl Heneghan of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University, titled “Why no one can ever recover from Covid-19 in England – a statistical anomaly” Carl Heneghan and his team at Oxford University had analysed Covid deaths figures from the Department of Health data and discovered a startling fraud at the very heart of the Covid Scamdemic. Their analysis revealed that Public Health England cross-checked the latest notifications of deaths against a database of positive test results – so that anyone who had ever tested positive is recorded in the Covid-19 death statistics.


“It seems that PHE regularly looks for people on the NHS database who have ever tested positive, and simply checks to see if they are still alive or not. PHE does not appear to consider how long ago the Covid test result was, nor whether the person has been successfully treated in hospital and discharged to the community,” the authors said.


Whilst this created the statistics used by the media, medical staff were also being cajoled into promoting the fraud at ground level.


13. The DofH changed the guidance on death certificates manipulating doctors into writing Covid-19 as the cause of death even when it obviously wasn't.

The Department of Health issued new guidance that told doctors exactly how they were to record deaths during the emergency period.


Everyone admitted to hospital was tested for Covid-19 and with a hit-rate of over 90% from a dodgy PCR test, almost everyone was 'getting it'. Thousands of patients admitted with entirely unrelated illnesses were being 'reclassified' as Covid patients within hours of being admitted. This gave the illusion that NHS hospitals were being overrun with Covid patients when the reality was they were no busier than normal.


For those that died before the PCR results came back, doctors were still instructed to record Covid as the cause of death If the patient had presented with "Covid-like symptoms" However, typical Covid symptoms were identical to typical flu symptoms (Myalgia, Fatigue, Fever, Cough) and with doctors subjected to the same psyops as the rest of us, they were unlikely to diagnose anything else. This proved to be the case when seasonal flu entirely disappeared in 2020, only to be replaced by an illness with exactly the same symptoms, effecting exactly the same people in exactly the same way.

The instructions stated:

Covid-19 is not a reason on its own to refer a death to a coroner under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009..

"Covid-19 is an acceptable direct or underlying cause of death for the purposes of completing the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death." "Medical Practitioners are required to certify cause of death "to the best of their knowledge and belief." "Without Diagnostic Proof, if appropriate, and to avoid delay, medical practitioners can circle '2' in the MCCD ("information from post-mortem may be available later") or tick Box B on the reverse of the MCCD for ante-mortem investigations. For example, if before death the patient had symptoms typical of Covid-19 infection, but the result has not been received, it would be satisfactory to give 'Covid-19' as the cause of death, tick Box B and then share the result when it becomes available.

The only way to determine a cause of death is by Coroner, but during the supposed pandemic Coroners were entirely excluded from the process. Clinicians were being funnelled down a particular course of action: 'declare the death as Covid and move on.'


14. The DofH allowed totally unqualified care workers to declare cause of death in absence of a Doctor

As incredible as it seems, the Department of Health issued guidance to care homes encouraging staff to declare cause of death as Covid in order to 'avoid delay'. All of a sudden a cause of death didn't have to be done by a doctor or coroner at all, but anyone not related to the deceased. Care workers were told they could declare cause of death merely with the help of someone on the other end of a telephone line. The same care workers who had been conditioned to see Covid everywhere for two full months beforehand.

The new guidance stated:

This guidance is designed to clarify existing practice for the verification of death outside of hospitals and to provide a framework for safe verification of death in this coronavirus (COVID-19) emergency period. It’s for all cases outside hospital when verification of death may be completed by people who have been trained to do so in line with their employer’s policies, including medical practitioners, registered nurses or paramedics. It’s also to be exercised by other non-medical professionals, usually and normally independent of family members, who are verifying death using remote clinical support. This helps avoid long delays in waiting for verification before the deceased person can be moved when medical practitioners are unavailable, which can be distressing for their families and those close to them.


Non-medical professionals should not experience any pressure to verify deaths. If they are not comfortable or equipped to verify, they should defer to medical colleagues or refer on to NHS 111, the patient’s general practice or another provider of primary medical services. If they are content to verify, they can use remote clinical support.


This guidance can be applied to verification of all expected deaths during this emergency period, at the end of which the guidance will be reviewed. An expected death is the result of acute or gradual deterioration in the patient’s health and often due to advanced disease and terminal illness. The guidance should be applied for both confirmed and unconfirmed COVID-19 cases. It is relevant to all adult deaths in all settings (healthcare, social care and domiciliary settings and circumstances), with the exception of when a case must be reported to the coroner. COVID-19 as a cause of death (or contributory cause) is not a reason on its own to refer a death to the coroner under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. That COVID-19 is a notifiable disease under the Health Protection (Notification) Regulations 2010 does not mean referral to a coroner is required by virtue of its notifiable status.


Community settings

This includes deaths occurring in a community setting including confirmed or unconfirmed COVID-19 cases. Verification of death is performed by professionals trained to do so in line with their employers’ policies (for example medical practitioners, registered nurses or paramedics) or by others with remote clinical support.


----------------------------------------------


In part three of our expose we will reveal the ways in which the government used psychological warfare on its own people to further the fraud, and how pharmaceutical companies paid social media companies millions of dollars to victimise anyone saying anything negative about their products.


To make sure you do not miss part three of this groundbreaking expose, sign-up to our newsletter using the link below.

188 views0 comments
bottom of page