Whilst One in every 43 Suffer full Heart Inflammation.
A new study has found cardiovascular adverse effects in a third of teenagers following Pfizer vaccination and heart inflammation in one in 43, raising fresh calls for the vaccine to be banned.
The preprint study (not yet peer-reviewed) enrolled 314 Thai adolescents aged 13-18, of which 13 were lost to follow up, leaving 301 who were monitored following vaccination. It found cardiovascular effects in 29.24% of patients, including tachycardia, palpitation and, in one patient, myopericarditis. Two patients had suspected pericarditis and four patients had suspected subclinical myocarditis. The most common cardiovascular effects were tachycardia (7.64%), shortness of breath (6.64%), palpitation (4.32%), chest pain (4.32%) and hypertension (3.99%).
The researchers noted that the “clinical presentation of myopericarditis after vaccination was usually mild, with all cases fully recovering within 14 days”. However, they added that “although clinical symptoms spontaneously resolved rapidly in all patients, the potential for cardiac fibrosis vaccine-related myocarditis remains unknown”.
Scientists in this study claim the mechanism is unknown, but state: it “may be related to the mRNA sequence that encodes for the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, or the immune response following vaccination”. which is exactly what others have been saying all along. Currently nobody is collating all these studies and doing a meta analysis, that should be something done by the MHRA, tasked with ensuring the safety of these medicines, but they do not look into any of the reports of adverse effects, whatsoever.
Seven instances of suspected heart inflammation (pericarditis and myocarditis) out of 301 people gives an incidence rate of 2.3%, or one in 43. Instances of cardiovascular adverse events more broadly were almost one in three.
The study appears to be mixed with the usual propaganda, at odds with the findings. The study claims that the incidence of cardiac injury or myocarditis following Covid infection “is much higher, estimated to be 100 times higher than mRNA COVID-19 [vaccine]-related myocarditis” But, how can the risk following infection be a hundred times higher than one in three or one in 43? That’s not possible. The study gives two references for its claim, but one is a study from 2013 and the other looks only at myocarditis in those who have died and gives no indication of rates.
Furthermore, a large Scandinavian study found the risk of severe myocarditis risk following Covid infection was negligible, with only around one excess event per 100,000 within 28 days of infection and a confidence interval that included zero. The risk found following vaccination was considerably higher than this.