top of page

How Britain's Sentencing Council Ushered in a Two-Tier Legal System

No longer is justice blind; it now sees race, gender, and identity first, and guess who's at the bottom of the list?


In the dying days of the last Labour government, a network of so-called ‘non-governmental organisations’ (NGOs) was quietly established—each designed to embed the socialist agenda deep within the fabric of Britain, regardless of who held political power. Among these was the Sentencing Council for England and Wales, an unelected and unaccountable body that has since wielded extraordinary influence over the nation’s legal system.


Officially described as a “non-departmental public body,” the Sentencing Council is tasked with developing sentencing guidelines, monitoring their implementation, and advising courts on the application of justice. But in practice, its role extends far beyond mere guidance. It is a powerful entity with unchecked influence over policing, courts, and sentencing, steering Britain’s justice system in a direction that many find deeply disturbing.


THE POWER TO SHAPE JUSTICE

While the Sentencing Council does not technically write new laws, it has been granted the authority to determine how existing laws are applied. This means it can prioritise certain crimes, minimise others, and even discourage judges from enforcing the law as written. In effect, the Council dictates who is punished, how severely, and—most controversially—who is granted leniency.


That influence was laid bare when the Council issued a shocking directive to high court judges, instructing them to be lenient towards offenders from certain minority groups. The guidance specifically recommended that the courts consider mitigating factors for young people, women, ethnic minorities, cultural minorities, faith minorities, and those who identify as transgender.


This, the Council claims, is an effort to acknowledge “disadvantage” and “systemic discrimination.” But for many, it is nothing short of legalised bias, a radical departure from one of the most fundamental principles of British justice: that all are equal under the law.


THE DEATH OF BLIND JUSTICE

Lady Justice, the Roman goddess of law and fairness, sits atop the High Court, blindfolded to symbolise impartiality—justice without prejudice. For centuries, this has been the foundation of British law. But now, that principle has been turned on its head.


No longer is justice blind; it now sees race, gender, and identity first, dictating sentencing accordingly. Those who fall under the Council’s protected categories are offered an escape hatch, a legal loophole that excuses their actions based on their background. Meanwhile, others—those who don’t fit into the woke-approved demographic—face the full, unforgiving force of the law. The result? A justice system that actively discriminates against white, straight, Christian men.

THE RISE OF TWO-TIER JUSTICE

From April 2nd, these new sentencing guidelines come into full effect, cementing a judicial framework that is openly anti-white, anti-male, anti-Christian, and anti-straight. Under this system, the law will no longer apply equally to all, but will instead operate on a sliding scale of identity-based privilege.


For the first time in British history, the criminal justice system will be overtly biased—not in favour of fairness, but in favour of ideology. It is a perverse inversion of justice: where certain groups, regardless of their crimes, are granted leniency; while others, by virtue of their identity alone, are punished to the fullest extent.


Make no mistake: this is not about equality. This is about control. It is a direct attack on the very fabric of Britain’s legal traditions and values, carried out by an unelected body that answers to no one.


If this two-tier system is allowed to continue unchallenged, the consequences will be irreversible. The Sentencing Council has quietly reshaped the rule of law—now it is up to the British people to decide whether they will accept this new reality or fight back before it’s too late.  But of course, fighting back is easier said than done: If you email your MP about it - you'll be arrested. If you discuss it in a Whatsapp group - you'll be arrested.   If you post a meme about it on social media - you'll be arrested, and if you protest on the streets about it - you'll be arrested.


Related:



コメント


bottom of page