The Social Contract is Broken, and the Government are the Ones Who Broke it. Is it Now time for the English People to Think the Unthinkable and Defend Themselves?
- Philip James

- Nov 3
- 2 min read

Britain’s Government Has Abandoned Its Core Duty—Protecting Citizens from Barbaric Violence. It’s Time to Ask: Why Obey a Regime That Refuses to Defend Us?
The Social Contract is well and truly broken, another ten innocent people stabbed on a train is testament to that. And, let's be perfectly clear, it was the Government who broke it. The Government's primary role is to protect the British People. Some would say that it is their only role.
Yet, whether walking the dog in the evening or taking a train, our lives are subject to sudden, extreme, and often lethal violence by barbaric foreigners.
Where They Came From Doesn't Matter.
Some were ferried in by UK Border Force, whose primary role is to secure our borders. Others slipped in as infiltrators. Many more were invited to work.
But, these categories are irrelevant. The salient fact remains: men whose ancestry does not lie in this country are launching murderous assaults on Britain’s indigenous inhabitants—at a staggering frequency.
Motives Don’t Matter Either.
Some attacks stem from madness, others from religious fervour. But, that too is irrelevant. It is happening and no gaslighting or weasel words from the Government can change it.
Active Hostility, Not Mere Incompetence.
The British State has not just failed to protect its people; overwhelming evidence shows it is actively facilitating their destruction. It is now hostile to its own citizens—evident in the mass incarceration of those who dare speak out against uncontrolled immigration.
The Social Contract Explained
By “social contract,” we mean the agreement that we grant the Government power over us, and in return it protects us from harm and maintains a safe, peaceful British society.
English philosopher Thomas Hobbes, a principal architect of the idea in his work Leviathan, warned of a “world of unrelenting insecurity” without a government to provide law and order.
Hobbes called it three hundred years ago, saying:
“…men [will be] in continual fear of danger and violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
This description grows closer by the day.
The Contract is Broken
We have adhered to our side. Yet we now live, as Hobbes put it, “in continual fear of danger and violent death.”
Margaret Thatcher summed it up in 1979:
“If a government can’t protect their citizens and their property against violence, vandalism, and theft, there is little point in having a Government at all.”
That is precisely the case in England today.
Who Broke It?
Even more troubling, speculation of this kind has prompted the Government to target those voicing it. But remember: it is the Government that knowingly shattered the contract. They shot the first salvo against the British people, turning on the very people they're supposed to protect.
They have forgotten they are public servants, not masters—and have deliberately orchestrated this island prison. They started this, not the people.
The Cambridgeshire Catalyst
After Saturday night’s brutal attack in Cambridgeshire, none of us can dodge the question any longer. Are we content to pretend the Government will protect us from the men Hobbes described—constrained only by their "ferocity, daring and imagination”?
Or must we now organise to undertake the defence the state cannot—or will not—provide?





Comments