Government Accelerate Facial Recognition Tech Following Cambridgeshire Train Attack
- Editor Darren Birks
- 3 minutes ago
- 3 min read
Within hours of a deranged black man's blood-soaked rampage on a Cambridgeshire-to-London train the first hints of how the Government would capitalise on the incident begin to be slipped in to news briefings.
Never letting a good crisis go to waste, the UK Government has used the attack to push the idea of Mandatory Digital IDs. Powered by biometric scans and facial recognition technology, Digital IDs would, according to authorities, make train-travel safer.
As the horrific event caused enough outrage the Home Office began to push that the attack had happened because of a 'lack of surveillance'. By day two of the aftermath the Home Office were declaring facial recognition “vital” for public safety and only hours after that Ministers were announcing that they just happened to have a facial recognition programme that would soon be installed in every major railway station in Britain.
A spokesperson told The Telegraph the Policing and Crime Minister has now ordered the acceleration of the programme calling it a “responsible increase.”
Shadow Home Secretary, Chris Philp, fell straight into lockstep, writing an op-ed demanding blanket CCTV in train stations, high streets, and city centres – all turbo-charged with intensified stop-and-search to “seize far more knives off the street.” Philp making it plain that, if the Conservatives were to ever get back in power, they too would implement a mass surveillance system. Facial Recognition isn’t the endgame. It’s the on-ramp. Digital ID is the destination.
Privacy campaigners have been warning of this for some time now, providing us with the facts and figures around the emerging dystopian tech, and the numbers are damning. Fresh Metropolitan Police data reveals officers scanned over three million faces across London between September 2024 and September 2025. The payoff? A measly 962 arrests. That’s 99.97% innocent people treated like suspects – over 3,000 scans for every single collar.
Dig deeper, and the rot spreads. Of those arrests, 113 led nowhere. Ten were outright false positives – innocent citizens flagged, detained, humiliated. Every UK citizen will be on a perpetual identity parade.
Jasleen Chaggar, campaigner at Big Brother Watch, branded the programme “Orwellian and authoritarian technology that treats millions of innocent people like walking suspects.” warning Britain is “sleep-walking into a permanent ID regime.”
The Government argues that the system will make everyone safer, but London already has more survelliance cameras than anywhere else on earth yet stabbings, phone thefts, and sexual assaults are all still on the rise. The data is already in and it shows that watching everyone all of the time has no effect on crime whatsoever.
This knife attack delivered the holy trinity: a dramatic backdrop, a terrified public, and a renewed mandate.
Facial recognition isn’t a debate anymore – it’s the rollout phase. The endgame is a nation where identity isn’t shown; it’s scanned. No wallet, no card, no privacy. Just your face, logged, tracked, and tied to a central Digital ID the moment you step onto a platform, cross a high street, or board a bus.
This isn't the first time the UK Government has cynically capitalised on a tragedy. The murder of David Amos became about 'online safety', with MPs calling for a 'crackdown' on hurty words on the internet. Two entirely unrelated topics that were shoehorned into one to push their agenda.
Critics warn of mission creep: today it’s knives, tomorrow it’s “pre-crime” profiling, dissent monitoring, or social credit scoring. The Met’s million-scan trial already proves the tech is inaccurate, invasive, and ripe for abuse. Yet ministers frame it as “responsible.” The public, still reeling from blood on the tracks, is being sold safety at the cost of freedom.
The direction is unmistakable. The Cambridgeshire stabber didn’t just wound 11 people – he handed the state the keys to your biometric future.
Related:
Comments