top of page

Every Vaccine Breaks UK Law as NHS Suppress 'Informed Consent'

The UK Government have administered 87.2 million doses of Covid-19 'vaccine', and EVERY SINGLE ONE BREAKS THE LAW.

THE NHS has what it calls an ‘easy to read’ form to be handed to people receiving the Covid-19 'vaccine', It explains, in simple language, why you should get the jab, what to expect when you’ve had it and how it will 'protect' you from Covid. You sign your name to indicate that you have read the form, and that you understand and agree that you have given informed consent.

In the form, the only side-effects the form mentions are a sore arm, fatigue or headaches. That's it. Nowhere does it mention blood clots, Bell’s palsy, blindness, miscarriages, cardiac arrest or any of the other side effects reported in their thousands, every day. The list of adverse reactions is a joke, or at least it would be were it not so serious. Informed consent has not been given if the NHS has not informed the patient that there is a real risk that they could suffer permanent, life changing injuries or even death from the vaccine. Telling the patient that they may get a sore arm is not informed consent.

Even more damning is that most patients don't even see that form anyway, and get to sign nothing. The 'clinician' administering the jab is often not a qualified doctor or nurse either, they'll more likely be one of the ten thousand volunteers that the NHS asked for, complete with all of a mornings training under their belt. These volunteers don't get any training in informed consent, and have absolutely no idea what the risks are to the patient from the experimental drug they're giving them anyway. They'll have been given a stack of these pathetic forms and assume that covers it. It doesn't.

One woman, who does not want to be identified, whose pro-vaccine father died after receiving the Pfizer vaccination in January, secretly filmed the ‘informed consent’ process at one of the UK’s biggest vaccine hubs. The 12-minute video, taken at the Greater Manchester Vaccination Centre, shows how little information you can expect before receiving what could be a life-changing jab. That video has, unsurprisingly, been expunged from the internet, another example of what social media calls 'misinformation'.

The UK Medical Freedom Alliance (UKMFA), a campaign group that includes health professionals, scientists and lawyers, are outraged and deeply concerned at the lack of informed consent. They have produced a fully referenced letter which says what information you should expect to receive before receiving a vaccination or indeed any medical procedure.

They are clear that the courts have decided that informed consent is part of English law, that you should be given information about treatment options available, what they involve and their risks and benefits. You must then base your decision on that advice. Your decision should be voluntary and not influenced by pressure from medical staff, friends or family.

Senior UK lawyer and retired army officer Anna de Buisseret, who is the head of the campaign group Lawyers For Liberty, says the whole thing is a shambles. She said: ‘We have had lots of reports that people are not being given the patient information leaflet that actually contains a lot of warnings about the side effects and what you need to do to ensure you have had a clinical individual risk assessment prior to going along for your injection.'

She goes on to say ‘We [Lawyers For Liberty] are working with a senior NHS whistle-blower who is a surgeon who trains people in informed consent. I asked him to check the protocols that were being given to the vaccinators. He examined them and he said there was nothing in them about the law and informed consent. It was all about how to administer the injection.'

Don't think that this is the usual incompetence we see from the public sector either, far from it, information of serious side effects and fatalities from the vaccines has been actively suppressed by the government. They have conspired with social media companies to have adverse event information removed from their sites, Whilst Chris Whitty, Jonathan Van Tam and others never refer to deaths or serious injuries caused by the vaccine, ever. Check the hundreds of hours of Covid briefings, radio and tv interviews and you will not find a single reference to death or serious injury inflicted by the vaccine anywhere in any of them. From the very first dose of an experimental gene therapy that they had absolutely no long term safety data for, any and all adverse events have been hushed up. Millions of innocent people have been lied to by the state, most are blissfully unaware that there have been any deaths from Covid Vaccines at all, believing it to be perfectly safe.

Doctors and Nurses are not routinely taught about the law or routinely taught about Nuremberg Code. Even research scientists are often vague about it. But a look at the code and you see that the NHS break virtually every one of its rules. The UK was one of the countries who drew up the Nuremberg Code in the first instance, we are now actively, and purposefully, breaking that code, and against our own people.

The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of research ethic principles for human experimentation created as a result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War. In one of the trials, which became known as the "Doctors' Trial", German physicians responsible for conducting unethical medical procedures on humans during the war were tried. They focused on physicians who conducted inhumane and unethical human experiments in concentration camps, in addition to those who were involved in over 3,500,000 sterilisations of German citizens.

The ten points of the code were given in the section of the verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments"

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

  9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

  10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Related Article

139 views0 comments


bottom of page