Coronavirus: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics: The 'Pandemic' That Never Was
From predictions that were fantasy, to the leaked government paper showing plans on how to instil fear in the public; The 5 pieces of evidence proving we've all been duped
1. Neil Ferguson's computer model was 13 years old, designed for a different virus, and DIDN’T WORK.
Sue Denim, an expert with 30 years of Silicon Valley experience said of Ferguson's work:
"The code doesn’t work"
"One of the most basic principles of modelling is that you need to be able to produce consistent results, before you can start making predictions." In the case of Neil Ferguson’s algorithm, their input would produce different results even when the input was exactly the same."
"Neil Ferguson knew the code was broken and tried to cover it up"
"Neil Ferguson and his team at Imperial College London were completely aware of the inherent flaws with their code, yet did nothing to fix these. Concerns were raised by a team at Edinburgh University after they had simply tried to save the file in a different format, and found that this resulted in the algorithm predicting an additional 80,000 deaths! Instead of addressing the problems at the heart of the code (which would have required some hard graft), Neil and his team simply ran the fundamentally flawed models numerous times and took an average. In any other job, Neil Ferguson would have been struck off for professional negligence, and perhaps even prosecuted for fraud. Somehow, though, through the murky world and connections of academia, this man ended up advising our Government to take its most drastic course of action since the surrender of Hong Kong."
2. ALL of Ferguson's previous predictions have been WRONG.
It was Ferguson who, in 2001, convinced Prime Minister Tony Blair to have 6 million cattle slaughtered to stop the FMD epidemic (a decision which cost 10 billion pounds and which is today considered aberrant ). In 2002, he calculated that mad cow disease would kill about 50,000 Britons and another 150,000 when it spreads to sheep. There were actually 177 deaths. In 2005, he predicted that bird flu would kill 65,000 Britons. There were a total of 457 deaths. Regardless, he became an advisor to the World Bank and many governments, and maintained an influence like no other statistician has done before.
Ferguson has been the architect of the Generalised Containment Theory which has not only influenced the UK Government but most in Europe. According to French News Outlet voltairenet.org it was Ferguson who sent a confidential note to French President Emmanuel Macron on March 12th announcing half a million deaths in France. Distraught, Macron made the general decision of confinement the same evening. It was also Professor Ferguson who publicly announced on March 16 that if nothing was done, there would be up to 550,000 dead in the United Kingdom and up to 1.2 million in the United States, binding the British government to review its policy.
Throwing darts at the phonebook would have been about as accurate.
3. The Death Figures are FALSE
A Department of Health and Social Care source said: “You could have been tested positive in February, have no symptoms, then be hit by a bus in July and you’d be recorded as a Covid death.”
The truth was revealed in a paper by Yoon K Loke and Carl Heneghan of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University, titled “Why no one can ever recover from Covid-19 in England – a statistical anomaly”. Previously, any suggestion that the death figures where vastly inflated and grossly inaccurate had been dismissed as being a conspiracy theory. Now, parts of the establishment have broken-ranks and published their analysis of what has been done by Public Health England and others. Their analysis suggests that Public Health England cross-checks the latest notifications of deaths against a database of positive test results – so that anyone who has ever tested positive is recorded in the Covid-19 death statistics. This statistical slight-of-hand means that the death figures, used to scare us into compliance, have been vastly exaggerated.
“It seems that PHE regularly looks for people on the NHS database who have ever tested positive, and simply checks to see if they are still alive or not. PHE does not appear to consider how long ago the Covid test result was, nor whether the person has been successfully treated in hospital and discharged to the community,” the authors said. They went on to say this was the reason why PHE figures “vary substantially from day to day”. They also said about 80,000 recovered patients in the community were continuing to be monitored by PHE for the daily death statistics, even though many are elderly and may die of something else.
4. Government Scientists PLANNED TO MAKE US ALL LIVE IN FEAR
Plans to manipulate the UK public into compliance were drawn up by Behavioural Scientists and used by the Government to instil fear and panic in the population. The document is a 'How To Guide' with clear instructions on how to suppress a public by psychological means. It is packed with instructions on coercion, manipulation and uses Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) to trick us all into complying. It suggests how the (above) death figures were important, so the higher the better, and even gives Boris Johnson specific phrases to use.
Paragraph 2 of the document contains the chilling sentence:
"The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging. To be effective this must also empower people by making clear the actions they can take to reduce the threat "
Click here to access the full document: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/887467/25-options-for-increasing-adherence-to-social-distancing-measures-22032020.pdf
5. The Ulterior Motive for This Pandemic
Former Supreme Court Justice LORD SUMPTION speaking on Radio 4 in March explained how an unsuspecting public will surrender its freedom willingly in return for protection from a perceived threat.
"The real problem is that when human societies lose their freedom, it’s not usually because tyrants have taken it away. It’s usually because people willingly surrender their freedom in return for protection against some external threat. And the threat is usually a real threat, but usually exaggerated"
"And that’s what I fear we are seeing now. The pressure on politicians has come from the public. They want action. They don’t pause to ask whether the action will work. They don’t ask themselves whether the cost will be worth paying. They want action anyway. And anyone who has studied history will recognise here the classic symptoms of collective hysteria."
"Hysteria is infectious. We are working ourselves up into a lather in which we exaggerate the threat and stop asking ourselves whether the cure may be worse than the disease."
Darren Birks is the Editor of Vision News Online