Teenage Boys Six Times More Likely to Suffer Heart Problems from Vaccine Than to Be Hospitalised from Covid, According to New Study.
As the Government is set to push Covid vaccines on all healthy children, against warnings from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), a major new U.S. study has found that teenage boys are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems due to the vaccine than to be hospitalised from Covid.
Children who face the highest risk of a “cardiac adverse event” are boys aged between 12 and 15 following two doses of a vaccine, according to major new study from the US. The study looked at MRNA vaccines – such as Pfizer and Moderna – which will be particularly relevant for Britain because youngsters will not be given the AstraZeneca jab because of the increased risk of dangerous blood clots.
A team led by Dr. Tracy Hoeg at the University of California investigated the rate of Cardiac Myocarditis (heart inflammation) – and chest pain in children aged 12-17 following their second dose of the vaccine. They then compared this with the likelihood of children needing hospital treatment owing to Covid, at times of low, moderate and high rates of hospitalisation. Researchers found that the risk of heart complications for boys aged 12-15 following the vaccine was 162.2 per million, which was the highest out of all the groups they looked at.
The second highest rate was among boys aged 16-17 (94.0 per million) followed by girls aged 16-17 (13.4 per million) and girls aged 12-15 (13.0 per million).
However the risk of a healthy boy needing hospital treatment owing to Covid in the next 120 days is 26.7 per million. This means the risk they face from heart complications is 6.1 times higher than that of hospitalisation.
This is based on current rates of hospitalisations from Covid-19, which are judged to be “moderate”. During a period of low risk of hospitalisation, such as June 2021, the likelihood of heart complications rises to 22.8 times higher, and during a period of high risk, such as January 2021, the likelihood of heart complications is still 4.3 times higher.
The study comes after the JVCI have already advised against the mass vaccination of 12 to 15 year olds, and a wealth of data from the Government's own Yellow Card reporting system confirming that ALL current Covid Vaccines represent a serious threat to life for young people. Chris Whitty is reportedly going to ignore all of the studies, JVCI recommendations and Death figures and press ahead with the plan to vaccinate the entire population, including all children and babies, whatever the risks.
Children Should Be Vaccinated to Benefit Their Mental Health, Says Chris Whitty
Last week the Joint Committee for Vaccinations advised not to give the Covid Vaccine to children aged between 12yrs and 15yrs which gave Chris Whitty a dilemma: How do you convince parents that their child needs an experimental gene-editing drug with a shocking safety record, when even the JVCI has warned against it? You claim that it is for the good of their mental health. And you thought it was about a virus.
After 18 months of imposing lockdown policies that damaged the mental health of every child in this country beyond measure, Chris Whitty is now about to use their mental health as the reason for their vaccination.
According to the Times Whitty is now set to recommend that children aged 12 and over should be vaccinated against Covid “to benefit their mental health, education and social development”. Gone is the idea that the vaccine will save them from the virus, or even that it prevents them spreading it, and in comes an even more tenuous and, frankly bizarre, reason to the jab to people who don't need it.
The Times reports:
The Chief Medical Officer for England is set to conclude a review of medical evidence early next week, with ministers promising that the first younger teenagers will be jabbed within five working days. …
Whitty and his counterparts in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are finalising a review into the wider benefits of child vaccination after the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation gave them responsibility for making a decision. [Or, rather, after the Government chose to ignore the JCVI.]
The committee concluded last week that although the benefits of vaccinating healthy children aged 12 to 15 slightly outweighed the risk, the balance in favour was too small to justify mass immunisation on health grounds alone. They said Whitty should be tasked with considering the broader benefits to children and his review has been holding discussions this week.
The Times goes on to claim 'The desire to stop children taking time off school sick, and to help them avoid worrying about the pandemic and learning to get on with their peer group were together judged to tip the balance in favour of vaccination.'
If you breakdown that statement his arguments dissolve, rapidly; the first part is based on a huge lie: children were off school because they were closed (by Whitty), or because someone received a positive PCR test - in neither case was a child actually sick. Secondly, to claim that children are worried about the pandemic when Whitty and his colleagues have made them that way with relentless propaganda designed to elicit fear and panic is a bit fucking rich even for him. Likewise implying that the jab will help with their mental health when they've been made to suffer by this bloke unnecessarily is at best a sick joke.
Suddenly we are meant to believe that Whitty cares about a child's mental health when he's spent the last 18 months willfully destroying it.
This isn't about a virus, and this isn't science, its state sponsored child abuse. Whitty has made a massive miscalculation here though, because when a child dies from the vaccine the public's outrage will be immense, and something he will not be able to control.