Starmer the Traitor: British Prime Minister Commits Treason Against the People and the Crown

Kier Starmer hasn't just betrayed the British people, in handing over sovereignty to the European Commission he has actively committed TREASON. This is not hyperbole, this is a fact as we will reveal.

Few people know that the Treason Act is still on the statute books. First enacted in 1351 the very same law that has seen many people hang from traitor's gate is still in force in the United Kingdom to this day.

Today the British Prime Minister committed treason. Kier Starmer surrendered Britain's sovereignty to the European Commission. Free movement of people back; fishing territories surrendered; EU rules on food imposed; EU rules on farming imposed; submission to the European Court of Justice; Brussels given control of British Army; and even the EU's Carbon Credit system imposed on unsuspecting Brits.

This wasn't a deal, this was a surrender. Kier Starmer voluntarily gave away to British sovereignty to a foreign power. This was expressly against the wishes of the British people who had overwhelmingly voted to leave the European socialist project in 2016.

Treason: The Act and How Kier Starmer Has Broken it

The relevant statute here is the Treason Act 1351, which, despite its age, remains enforceable in the United Kingdom. It defines treason as, among other things:

“...when a man doth compass or imagine the death of our lord the King... or if a man do levy war against our lord the King in his realm, or be adherent to the King's enemies in his realm, giving them aid and comfort in the realm, or elsewhere.”

While modern interpretations of the law require a high threshold, the clause about being “adherent to the King’s enemies... giving them aid and comfort” remains pivotal.

In context: if a British Prime Minister knowingly surrenders control of national assets, defence sovereignty, and legislative independence to a foreign power, against the national interest, without democratic consent — this could reasonably be construed as “aid and comfort” to adversaries of the Crown.

Lord Haw Haw: The Last Person We Hanged For Treason

The last person hanged for it was in living memory. The last person executed for treason in the UK was William Joyce, better known as Lord Haw Haw, who was hanged in 1946. Joyce broadcast Nazi propaganda from Germany to Britain during World War II. Though born in the United States and holding an American passport, Joyce was convicted of treason because he held a British passport at the outbreak of war, which obligated him to loyalty to the Crown.

His case set a legal precedent: a duty of loyalty to the United Kingdom, regardless of personal political views, cannot be casually dismissed — especially by those who benefit from the privileges and powers of office.

Of course, Keir Starmer is not broadcasting wartime propaganda for a foreign enemy. But his repeated subordination of British interest to EU demands, his dismantling of hard-won Brexit protections, and his systematic reversal of national sovereignty do raise the question: At what point does policy failure become betrayal?

The Case for Accountability

To treat treason as a purely historical relic is dangerous. Laws exist to guard against precisely the kind of actions we are witnessing now: the undermining of British self-governance through secretive deals, foreign alignment, and political deceit.

At the very least, Parliament must debate whether this unprecedented surrender of sovereignty is consistent with the obligations of office under the UK’s constitution.

This is not a matter of party politics. It is a matter of national survival, of legal responsibility, and of loyalty to the British people.

If the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom cannot be held to account for knowingly dismantling British independence, then what is treason — and who, if anyone, can ever be guilty of it? I say he should swing, what say you?

Related:

Keir Starmer's Secret Communist Vision for Britain