Is CHRIS WHITTY the MOST EVIL MAN in BRITAIN?

Part One of an astonishing Exposé.

If you read the Guardian or BBC News during 2020, you’d have been forgiven for thinking that Chris Whitty was some sort of demigod — a clinical genius who saved the British people from an apocalyptic plague just by the weight of his own intellect.

Article after gushing article told us how this unassuming, quietly spoken doctor saved countless lives and that we must all be eternally grateful to him for saving us.

In reality, Chris Whitty was the exact opposite. He was, and is, a truly evil man. He has been caught fabricating evidence, manipulating data, forging a crisis, deliberately endangering the lives of millions of children, all whilst failing to declare the mother of all conflicts of interest, and all for money and power, which he now has in bucketloads thanks to the 'pandemic'.

Whitty, along with co-conspirators Patrick Vallance and Jonathan Van-Tam, spearheaded the 2020 “pandemic” — not the response, you understand, but the pandemic itself. These three charlatans were in the pay of Big Pharma before, during, and after the supposed crisis. That’s right: the very same people who claimed there was a new plague in town were the very same people selling you the snake oil supposed to cure it.

To understand just how evil Chris Whitty truly is, we must first examine his origin story. Officially, Chris Whitty is a Professor of Epidemiology — itself a pseudoscience that claims to be able to predict epidemics through the use of questionnaires (yes, really) and a lot of dubious computer modelling.

Whitty portrays himself as an academic and, as such, loftily above such basic desires as chasing profits, pushing commercial products, or making up crises to sell “cures”. In reality, Whitty’s entire career has been doing exactly that.

They pulled all the strings.

No independent research has ever been done by Chris Whitty; only research chosen by Big Pharma, funded by Big Pharma, and whose results only ever confirmed a sales pitch for Big Pharma. Whitty knows that any paper that even hints a Pharma product is useless or dangerous will result in no more funding for any future work… ever.

In 2016 Whitty received £30 million to “research” the efficacy of a new malaria drug and — what do you know? — Whitty gave it a glowing report. He always gives them a glowing report. This is how drug companies operate: acquiring seemingly robust provenance for their product when really they have just paid academics to give their product a good review. The “study” appears independent, the authors above reproach, and the results of the highest calibre. In reality none of that is true — a mere illusion created by lies and misdirection. This is the game Whitty is in, and he’s very good at it. Each side retains a degree of deniable plausibility while both know exactly what is expected of the other.

This is why Whitty claimed he had no conflict of interest when advising the government on Covid in 2020. In truth he was bought and paid for by Big Pharma. He certainly wasn’t impartial; he was sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry.

Once you understand that Whitty was sponsored by Big Pharma, everything else becomes clear. That was his motivation — or rather, the motive for his crimes.

A 'plague doctor' who was appointed just weeks before a new plague was discovered.

Whitty’s appointment as Chief Medical Officer in 2019 also raises serious questions. Why an epidemiologist? Why not a cancer specialist or a heart-disease expert? A “plague doctor” being appointed right before a new plague was announced should have rung alarm bells, but only one journalist on a minor website picked up on the odd appointment, asking why epidemiology, of all things, got top billing.

He got his answer only a few weeks later when SARS-CoV-2 was suddenly 'discovered'.

Whitty also failed to let the public know that, all the time he was advising the government, he was also part of the WHO’s European governance committee — another bought-and-paid-for NGO. Effectively, when he then claimed that it was not him but the World Health Organisation who was coming up with all these new recommendations, he was really just playing both characters in an orchestrated farce of advising himself.

Whitty began “advising” the government that a plague was coming on 3 January 2020 — which is now widely thought to have been pre-planned, as there was no way the WHO could have known a real plague was coming, certainly not that quickly, given the total lack of evidence.

Lockstep

Whitty was in lockstep with every other country’s medical officer. This was a coordinated and deliberate effort to cause a public scare to sell a “cure”, and Chris Whitty was at the very heart of the fraud.

Part Two tomorrow. - subscribe to our mailing list using the link below.

Related: