Halal Debate Reveals Who Really Controls Britain

Commons debate over Halal slaughter reveals the chilling truth about who is in control of Britain.

Yesterday the British government debated Halal slaughter following a petition that gained over 109,000 signatures. The petition raised the issue of Halal slaughter in Britain that, until now, has had a de facto exemption from animal welfare laws due to it being an Islamic practice.

The petition stated: 

In modern society, we believe more consideration needs to be given to animal welfare and how livestock is treated and culled. We believe non-stun slaughter is barbaric and doesn't fit in with our culture and modern-day values and should be banned, as some EU nations have done.

In a landmark case, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that a ban on the ritual slaughter of animals without prior stunning does not violate the ECHR. The Court considered that the protection of public morals, to which Article 9 of the Convention referred was not indifferent to the living environment of individuals covered by its protection and including animals.

Halal involves the slitting of an animals throat and allowing the blood to drain from the animal as the cause of death.  The animal dies in excruciating pain, usually from a heart attack brought on by the massive trauma.  It is rare that the one cut is sufficient and the slaughterer often has to make several attempts before the animal dies. This is often denied by supporters of the faith, but animal welfare campaigners have video evidence of this from a number of locations.

In videos of the practice on social media goats and sheep can be seen writhing around in agony and heard screaming in terror as the slaughterer hacks at their neck. In one video a goat is seen being slaughtered in what appears to be the living room of a house, the goat is strung up on the banisters whilst several asian men are seen watching. This type of practice is reportedly commonplace, but was also denied during the commons debate.

The 'debate' was an astonishing spectacle that chillingly revealed who really runs Britain. The petition wasn't debated at all if truth were told. Apart from Rupert Lowe, there were no voices in favour of a ban, instead, Muslim after Muslim MP stood up and played the race-card. All of them claimed the petition was 'Islamaphobic', that catch-all phrase that prevents anyone from questioning anything about the Islamic faith, accused petitions supporters of being racist, that it was really a 'dog whistle' and one inferring the supporters were Nazis. The Muslim MPs, all appearing to read from a script, then devoted the rest of their time to 'Whataboutery' talking about every other method that wasn't Halal.

Rupert Lowe shocking speech at the Halal debate.

The Commons debate laid bare a stark truth: Britain’s Parliament no longer speaks for the British people. Instead, it has been infiltrated by individuals whose loyalties appear to lie very much elsewhere, not with national values of Britain. When over 100,000 citizens raise animal welfare issues rooted in modern British principles, and their voices are dismissed as bigotry by MPs, more focused on shielding religious customs than upholding national standards, it becomes clear that the agenda driving parts of our legislature is no longer British.

Related:

Islam Infiltration: Over 700 Fifth-Columnists Found in the Heart of Government Plotting Against the British People

Thought Police Arrest Islam Critic Who Warned About Anti-Semitism