Fake Data Breach Lets 100,000 Afghans into UK, No Questions Asked

Fake Narrative is full of plot holes.

The so-called Afghan data breach is nothing more than a fabricated tale designed to slip 100,000 Afghans into Britain without a shred of proper vetting. This narrative, pushed by officials and parroted by the media, collapses under the slightest scrutiny. It’s riddled with contradictions, gaping plot holes, and convenient propaganda—an unbelievable yarn that makes The Salt Path look like a hard-hitting documentary.

Let’s break it down: the official story claims that in February 2022, a Royal Marine accidentally sent an email attaching details of 25,000 Afghans applying for relocation. This Marine was supposedly in charge of vetting asylum seekers and sent the sensitive data to a group of “trusted Afghan contacts” in the UK.

Pause and think for a moment: why on earth would a Royal Marine Commando—trained for combat—be handling Home Office admin work? Does the idea of a battle-hardened soldier sorting spreadsheets and emailing “trusted Afghan contacts” sound plausible to anyone? And who exactly were these trusted contacts, and why did they need this list anyway?

It gets stranger. The Marine apparently sent the email twice, making the “accident” explanation even flimsier. Yet we’re expected to believe he handled the vetting process, breached security twice, and nothing triggered alarm bells for over a year.

Fast forward to August 2023: the so-called breach only came to light when someone in Afghanistan posted part of the list on Facebook—demanding immediate asylum in Britain or threatening to publish the rest. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) quickly flew him over after labelling the stunt as “essentially blackmail.”

So what happened to the “trusted Afghan contacts” in the UK who first got the email? Either they weren’t trustworthy—or, more likely, they never existed in the first place.

Just when the official line couldn’t sound any more far-fetched, the MoD added yet another twist: the spreadsheet allegedly contained the names of MI6 spies and SAS operatives as well. Since when does an Asylum Seeker list need to include spies? It reeks of classic misdirection—throw in spies, urgency, and danger, and the press stops asking questions.

To top it off, new reports claim that Afghans have been assassinated because their names were on this list—just the kind of unverifiable tragedy needed to keep people from poking holes in the story. Predictably, no evidence backs any of it up.

The truth is simple: while everyone is distracted by this elaborate fable, tens of thousands of people were quietly flown into Britain, bypassing all standard immigration checks. The excuse? The incompetent British army endangered the brave Afghans who helped us—so we must now roll out the red carpet, no questions asked.

The narrative has it all: heroic Afghans, bungling Brits, spies, secrets, danger—an irresistible tale for a media all too happy to play along.

You’re being played.