The lead author is also listed [elsewhere] as having a 'special interest' in health effects of electromagnetic radiation of 5G.
A new study on Covid-19 vaccines reports that they are up to 100 times more likely to cause a young adult serious injury than prevent him or her from being hospitalised with the disease.
Most surprising of all about this study is that one of it's authors, Dr. Kevin Bardosh, is a recipient of funding from the Wellcome Trust an organisation at the very heart of the Pandemic fraud.
In the report the researchers estimate that 22,000-30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent just one COVID-19 hospitalisation. In the study, which is currently undergoing peer-review, the authors analyse CDC and reported adverse event data and find that booster mandates are likely to cause a net expected harm.
They estimate that for every COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, 18 to 98 serious adverse events will occur, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of serious injury which interferes with daily activities.
The authors add that given the high level of natural immunity following infection, the actual risk-benefit profile is even less favourable. On the basis of this evidence they argue that university booster mandates are unethical because:
no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for the age group;
vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people;
mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission;
U.S. mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and
mandates create wider social harms.
They consider counterarguments, such as a desire for socialisation and safety, and show that such arguments are weak and lack scientific and ethical support.
The authors include Dr. Vinay Prasad of the University of California and Dr. Martin A. Makary and Dr. Stefan Baral of Johns Hopkins University. A previous intervention in February by many of the same authors, published in BMJ Global Health, took a strong ethical stance against vaccine coercion in the form of mandates and passports.
The lead author Kevin Bardosh is also listed [elsewhere] as having a special interest in health effects of electromagnetic radiation (wifi, 5G, etc).
While the present paper is focused on vaccine coercion for University students, (could one or more of the scientists have children off to university this year perchance?) its arguments can equally apply to all young adults. It is perfectly clear, from the mountain of studies that all conclude the same thing, covid vaccines pose a serious risk to health of young people when there is no evidence that the mythical virus itself does anything to them whatsoever.