Boris Johnson announces the experimental drug, that is FOUR TIMES more likely to kill you than the virus, will be mandatory for the young by de facto.
The Prime Minister announced at today's Covid briefing that only the fully vaccinated will be allowed to enter nightclubs and other big events by the end of September.
Many appear to be surprised by this announcement, including those in the industry, with one pointing out that "Freedom Day" for them had lasted just 17 hours. This is down to the fact that they've foolishly believed everything that Johnson, Whitty, Vallance and others have told them. Perhaps they should have subscribed to Vision News.
Just six months ago, Vaccines Minister Nadhim Zahawi ruled out the introduction of “discriminatory” vaccine passports in England. “That’s not how we do things,” he said. But we had already reported on secret plans for their implementation, they were always going to be implemented, regardless of the blatant lies.
First we had the fake news claims, with everyone saying that Vaccine Passports were a conspiracy theory and would never be implemented in the UK. Then the government said that they were 'just looking' at the idea. However an internal paper in July 2020 laid out the plan with ways around any legal challenges. In August 2020 the government said they were 'just looking' into the idea and that nothing had been decided; again, that was a lie, the same month they had put the contract out to tender, and two tech companies were selected to produce them. Still the charade continued, Michael Gove was appointed Vaccine Passport Minister the very same week he appeared on Sky News to say that there were no such things in the pipeline, with a straight face he claimed he did not no of any such plans for domestic Vaccine Passports at all.
In February of this year Boris Johnson was hinting that they may be coming but they were part of a 'range of options', in reality the software was, by that point, already in Beta testing. March, April and May saw protests about vaccine passports with over a million people marching in London against their implementation. At that point, the UK Government suggested that the idea had been evaluated and that there was not a case for their implementation. It was dead in the water.
Then, they were suddenly back on the table again with the government telling nightclubs and other large venues that it was their “social responsibility” to check their customers’ Covid status. “Covid status” gave the impression that a negative test or recent recovery from the virus would be enough for entry to be granted as opposed to just full vaccination, but this is the Newspeak style language the government uses at work here. The BBC reported that approximately 80% of Nightclubs weren't going to police vaccine passports. With so few nightclubs having decided ‘voluntarily’ to introduce checks, Zahawi has announced that they will be forced to do so from late September. And this time, nothing short of full vaccination will open the door for entry, barring unvaccinated Brits from all such venues. Again, this appears to be 'in response to' the reaction of Nightclubs but we reported back in April that nightclubs would be forced to police passports or face a £50,000 fine.
Nadhim Zahawi said proof that people are fully vaccinated against coronavirus will be required for them to be allowed into nightclubs and other “crowded venues” from that point. (that'll be pubs) Until then, Covid passes – which show if you are vaccinated or have tested negative for the virus – will be required, although these are not mandatory for venues to operate.
In the Commons this afternoon, Mr Zahawi said: “By the end of September everyone aged 18 and over will have the chance to receive full vaccination and the additional two weeks for that protection to really take hold. So at that point we plan to make full vaccination a condition of entry to nightclubs and other venues where large crowds gather."
adding “Proof of a negative test will no longer be sufficient.”
Boris Johnson also refused to rule out future vaccine passports for pubs and bars, saying the government the government “reserved the right to do what’s necessary to protect the public.”
“I would remind everybody that some of life’s most important pleasures and opportunities are likely to be increasingly dependent on vaccination,” said Johnson, openly threatening those who don’t get jabbed that their lifestyle will be severely stunted.
The measures are being introduced to bully the 35% of 18 to 30-year-olds who haven’t taken the jab into getting it.
Once domestic vaccine passports have become commonplace for travel and to enter crowded venues, expect them to be extended to every other area of life.
This will create a two tier society where those who for whatever reason refuse to have the vaccine will remain under de facto lockdown indefinitely.
Related Article:
UK Government About to Break the Nuremberg Code and Make Vaccines Mandatory by De Facto
The UK government are planning to force ALL people to take the vaccine in direct breach of the Nuremberg Code.
Not only are the UK government planning on denying people international travel if they don't have it, but also entry into pubs, restaurants, sports events, and any public buildings. To try and get around the freedom of choice issue, the Government's plan is to make the service and leisure industries be the fall-guys.
As we reported last year, vaccine ‘passports’ will be required for ALL international travel from 2021. In addition the UK government are planning for the hospitality and leisure industries to police this law by demanding people produce vaccine certificates before they are allowed to enter pubs and restaurants. Fines of up to £50,000 for every breach of these rules could be levied to force companies to comply. Pubs will not only have to ask for ID at the door, but will also demand an up-to-date Covid Vaccine certificate in future.
UK vaccine minister Nadhim Zahawi said he expects bars, cinemas, restaurants and sports stadiums to all demand proof of vaccination against COVID-19 before allowing customers to enter their venues. boasting "It Will Become Virtually Impossible To Do Anything If You Don’t Have The Vaccine" effectively forcing the public to have the vaccination by de facto.
The vaccines, although administered already to over 15 million people in the UK, are still in their trial stage, none of them finishing trials until 2023. The US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials database at the Pfizer BioNTech SE Clinical Study Trial for instance states, somewhat alarmingly, that their trails have an Estimated Study Completion Date is January 31, 2023.
no patient was informed of this fact, that effectively they are part of a huge experiment, which is in DIRECT CONTRADICTION to the Nuremberg Code.
The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of research ethic principles for human experimentation created as a result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War. In one of the trials, which became known as the "Doctors' Trial", German physicians responsible for conducting unethical medical procedures on humans during the war were tried. They focused on physicians who conducted inhumane and unethical human experiments in concentration camps, in addition to those who were involved in over 3,500,000 sterilisations of German citizens.
The ten points of the code were given in the section of the verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments"
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.